Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravindrakirti Swami Ji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, discounting the sockpuppetry. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:43, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ravindrakirti Swami Ji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability asserted, but not supported. —swpb^T 21:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —swpb^T 21:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —swpb^T 21:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —swpb^T 21:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This page is about a very highly followed Jain Guru. There should be a wikipedia article/page about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktsema (talk • contribs) 13:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Swami Ravindrakirtiji is a very renowned Jain Guru. His sheer dedication towards the development of Jain pilgrimages and temples is emphatic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AKasliwal (talk • contribs) 13:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There should definitely be a page about Swamiji. His work speaks volumes about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZAngami (talk • contribs) 14:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This page deserves to be on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrAPatni (talk • contribs) 14:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The above comments are confirmed sock puppets, and have been blocked. —swpb^T 14:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I could find only passing mentions in a couple of newspaper stories. Fails WP:BIO. utcursch | talk 22:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. 2 passing mentions in news stories -- and the rest unsourced -- does not notability make. The sockpuppetry doesn't help, either. GAB^Hello! 21:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 03:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.